4-Aug-2025 06:11:42 Quality: 0.

One side of the tin foil hats says Obama is implicated in these papers released by Tulsi. The other side has been saying for years that Tulsi is a Russian asset.
Kinda convenient timing to release this stuff while everyone is obsessing over the Epstein files.

I've seen analysis from both sides - one saying, "Oh yeah, it's the smoking gun", the other saying, "It doesn't really say what the media is saying it says". I don't really give a !@$# enough to read the papers myself, but if I had to put a bet on it, I'd say it's just another wag-the-dog story. If it actually implicated Obama, Trump's DOJ would be all over it because that would immediately become a much bigger story than who is or is not on some list of Epstein's buddies.

Both sides are corrupted, which is another reason I am not going to spend my time sifting through hundreds of pages myself - whether this implicates Obama or not, it's clear he betrayed the American people, just like viritually every other president that's sat in office since JFK's assassination.

---Pez

[ -- Message edited on: 4-Aug-2025 06:13:42 by Pez (#324) -- ]

4-Aug-2025 13:02:53 Quality: 0.

Nothing but lies.

Not one post is hidden from down votes.
Just you censoring me because your little feelings were hurt because you cannot debate and never did.
It was ALAWAYS you that made it personal and were taking shots at me acting like sisters with others acting all catty.

You lie Pea because liars lie

Truth matters.

You are low in character

4-Aug-2025 13:19:05 Quality: 0.

A far greater scandal that implies seditious conspiracy and treason is Russiagate.

Obama was at Diddy parties and Epstein island so he is guilty with that sick sheet also.

Obama is a treasonous traitor that was never eligible to be Pres to begin with.

So Tulsi is a Russian asset and you imply Trump is....
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

NO DEBATE SKILLS

[ -- Message edited on: 4-Aug-2025 13:21:38 by master of disaster (#15067) -- ]

4-Aug-2025 13:40:10 Quality: 0.

Those posts required no cleaning up as you say.

Post them all here right now for all to see how insincere and corrupt you are as u appointed censor.

Not back in the thread.
Post them all here now

Lets see who is lying

4-Aug-2025 13:46:45 Quality: 0.

Claiming Tulsi is a Russian asset without providing a single receipt other than a simple minded claim by a lowbrow censor has got to be the stupidest thing I have ever read on this site.
Maybe ever.

Not one receipt

Just groupings of logical fallacies trying to be relevant

[ -- Message edited on: 4-Aug-2025 13:48:14 by master of disaster (#15067) -- ]

4-Aug-2025 14:10:15 Quality: 0.

Bring receipts that Tulsi is a Russian asset without using a logical fallacy.

You are only chewing someone else's cud.

Empty shell.
You got nothing.

Russia gate brings down the house starting at the top.
The left are projecting and trying transference.
This includes Pez

4-Aug-2025 19:13:03 Quality: 0.

You got to let things drop MoD. Rehashing things from 4 years ago that don't need to be brought back up isn't good or healthy. I tend to lean on your side with things MoD, but it's hard when you do things like that. It also hurts your case when you attack Pez out of the blue like you did recently. Kind of odd. I think your messages would go further if you took a more friendly tone. You seem to always be on the defensive towards so many people on here besides me. You're not always in enemy territory, sometimes you are truly standing in the middle of neutral land.

5-Aug-2025 00:19:02 Quality: +1.

On the defensive? Nah, dude, be real. His tone has always been _aggressively_ offensive. I haven't talked to him in over a year and just from what I skimmed when I saw your post he was calling me names out of the blue? As I haven't addressed him in forever, there's no "defensive" here, he's clearly just trying to agitate me with aggressive middle-school-level bully tactics.

Unfortunately for whatever part of him really wants me to engage, I graduated middle school quite sometime ago and I'm going back to just having my eyes jump over anything that he posts. Some people are just blatantly disrespectful and toxic and will never change. I'm too old to give people like that anymore of my attention.

---Pez

5-Aug-2025 13:09:05 Quality: 0.

Absolute total B.S.
You are guilty of some of the worse crimes imaginable for a political debate forum.

You have attempted to whitewash these crimes by waiting it out.
Now you begin taking g political shots like you never perpetrated these crimes and even attempt to gaslight.

You are a moderator that abused their authority and treated it like a special personal advantage.

You never apologized for it and continue to demand me to pay a penance and do extra things and perform tasks you demand from me to satisfy your punishments issued and demand of me.

Fine.

But you relinquish your right to participate in a forum you supposedly moderate.

And lets face it.
You have demonstrably prove you do not have that maturity or self control to participate in a thread you moderate.

Your recent attempts began with a long post taking shots and issuing backhanded insults while littering the place with a string of logical fallacies from outdated and proven hoaxes and lirs.

You are not fit to moderate a thread you are openly disengenuously participating in.

You simply lack moral character to do both

5-Aug-2025 19:40:22 Quality: 0.

You cannot judge others motives based on who they support.
You are not moral.
Coming from you it is all fallacious and gaslighting.
You cannot be taken seriously.
And your style is to only use logical fallacies to try, TRY, and make a point.
But it is nothing but emotional claims not anything valid or with substance.
You are a horrible debate.
Everything is emotional like how women argue and manipulate.

Stay away from politics, religion, ideals and truth.
You do not meet any qualifications to have a valid view worthy of public discussion.

A qtard will always be better than the retard who uses the word qtard